Showing posts with label Better Software. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Better Software. Show all posts
Feb 26, 2015
Book Review - "Don't Make Me Think" by Steve Krug
Nov 24, 2013
Toosl for the job: UML Artifacts, and other Techniques I Always Carry
To understand an existing system or a problem domain one needs to break it apart into smaller pieces. UML Artifacts have been my tool of choice for decomposing a system or understanding a business problem and designing a solution to address the issues that come up.
The UML Artifacts I commonly use in almost daily basis include:
The UML Artifacts I commonly use in almost daily basis include:
Nov 17, 2013
Test the quality of your assumptions as you analyze, design, code, test and deploy/ship your next app.
As you prepare to tackle a new project, you probably make sure all the proverbial IT ducks are in a row. From skills sets, tools in both hardware and software, environments, connections... the list seems endless at times. You always make sure to acquire the highest quality of tools and skill sets that your budget can buy. Have you ever considered to inspect the value or the quality of your assumptions as you step into a new project? Failure to keep assumptions in check may lead us to have faith in pursuing a goal of oversimplification, or worse, believing in a myth!
Nov 12, 2013
Simple Cost Benefit Analysis for the Software Developer
I took some college courses about finance a few years back. Little did I know that the knowledge I acquired during those sessions was going to become handy during a discussion about the best course of action on a project we were reviewing. In this case, the conversation went something like this:
We need to add functionality "x". If / when we do this our application will perform much better and it would clean up our design.
But the cost to analyze, design, code, and test would be very expensive. You know development hours are expensive! How about we "throw more hardware" at the problem?
It has got to be cheaper than coding it right. Besides, we do not want to over engineer something if we don't have to. Right?
We need to add functionality "x". If / when we do this our application will perform much better and it would clean up our design.
But the cost to analyze, design, code, and test would be very expensive. You know development hours are expensive! How about we "throw more hardware" at the problem?
It has got to be cheaper than coding it right. Besides, we do not want to over engineer something if we don't have to. Right?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)